Return to: Academic Health Center : myU : U of M Home

Gold University of Minnesota M. Skip to main content. Link to University of Minnesota homepage
Center for Gerontological Nursing interior masthead
Whats Inside
About the Center

Contact Us

Research and Practice

Education

Members and Advisors

Resources

LTC Nursing Leadership

Faculty Teaching Resources

Gero Journal Club

 

  Center Home

School Site

About
Our School
Research
Academic Programs
Online Learning
Centers and Partnerships
Cooperatives
Faculty and Staff
News and Events
Diversity
Public Service

For
Prospective Students
Current Students
Faculty and Staff
Parents
Preceptors
Alumni and donors

Quick Links
Employment Opportunities
Make a Gift to the School
Minnesota Continence Associates


Contact Us
Contact Information

Home
School of Nursing Home

Search

Home > LTC Nursing Leadership > Research Reviews

printer-friendly version  

Long-Term Care
Nursing Leadership and Management

Research Reviews

The Relationship Between Nurse Staffing Levels in Nursing Homes and Quality Indicators: A Literature Review
M E Dellefield, 2000
Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 27(6), 14-28

The current national crisis in nursing home staffing has been underscored by claims that research has demonstrated a relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care. Dellefield addresses that claim through a systematic and thorough review of the literature on nurse staffing and quality of care. Using Donabedian's Quality Framework, the variables examined in each study are classified according to structure, process and outcome indicators. Dellefield provides a succinct, clear overview of Donabedian's Quality Framework and gives extensive examples of the three types of quality indicators within the context of nursing homes. A fourth type of quality indicator, the composite indicator, is identified which combines both process and outcome indicators. The number and type of deficiencies for a state survey is an example of a composite indicator.

research file foldersDellefield reviewed 27 research studies that were conducted as early as 1977 and as recently as 1999. Some of the studies used more than one type of indicator. The dependent variable for 12 of the studies used outcome indicators and 11 of the studies used composite indicators as the dependent variable. There were 13 studies which used structural indicators as either the independent or dependent variable. Only four studies used process indicators as the independent variable.

The findings from these studies on the relationship between quality (as measured by different quality indicators) and nurse staffing were mixed and inconsistent. The studies defined and measured the quality indicators differently. The types of quality indicators used in the 17 studies were limited and in some cases questionable as to whether they were influenced by nurse staffing. The most frequently used structural indicator was ownership of the nursing home. Outcome indicators were more varied, however, even similar quality indicators (e.g. physical functioning) were defined and measured differently between studies.

The studies reviewed by Dellefield found that nurse staffing was defined either as total nurse staffing hours or nursing staff skill mix or both. The majority of studies explored the relationship between nursing staff skill mix and quality indicators. Even within these two categories, however, there was variation in how nurse staffing was defined and operationalized. For example, one study identified skill mix as the percentage of direct care staff that were RNs and another study identified skill mix as the total number of licensed hours.

Dellefield provides an extensive summary of the overall findings of these studies and identifies clinical, research and policy implications of these findings. She suggests that nursing homes may be motivated to evaluate the relationship between their quality indicators and staffing given the recent implementation of the investigative protocol on sufficient staff in nursing services as a component of the standard nursing home survey process.

Dellefield concludes, and rightly so, that based on the published research about staffing and quality care, it may be premature to advocate for mandated nursing staff skill mix to resident ratios. Rather, the literature provides ample evidence to support advocating for a mandated minimum level of total nursing care hours and then allowing providers to determine how to configure the skill mix.

Clearly more research in this very important area of concern to nurse leaders in long-term care is needed. Researchers should be encouraged to identify a common data set with consistent definitions of variables to use for studies regarding nurse staffing and quality care. Nurse leaders in long-term care should develop strategies to monitor quality care in relationship to nurse staffing trends and patterns in their facilities.

fountain pen

Reviewed by Christine Mueller, PhD, RN, Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Center for Gerontological Nursing, University of Minnesota, July 2001.

Links



Feedback | Notice of Privacy Practices

 
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.